According to the most recent American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) update in 2008, monitored anaesthesia care (MAC) is a specific anaesthesia service for diagnostic or therapeutic surgery done under local anaesthesia along with sedation and analgesia, determined by titration to a level that preserves spontaneous breathing and airway reflexes. A substantial portion of anaesthetic services provided nationwide are MAC alone or in combination with local anaesthetic. MAC primarily consists of three fundamental parts: a secure conscious sedation, calming procedures for the patient's anxiety, and efficient pain management Compared to general anaesthesia, this service (MAC) causes less physiologic disruption and has a quicker recovery time. MAC is appropriate for day care procedures because it speeds up tracking.

The standard of care includes a proper preanesthetic evaluation, standard intraoperative monitoring, and customary postoperative treatment. It is essentially exactly the same for general or regional anaesthesia. There is a clear distinction between MAC and moderate sedation. MAC comprises the provision of mental health support as well as the support of essential bodily functions and the treatment of any intraoperative issues. Continuous patient interaction, monitoring of vital signs including oxygenation, ventilation, circulation, and temperature, and watchfulness for the harmful effects of local anaesthesia are all included in monitoring. Capnography is a crucial monitoring element of MAC that allows for the early detection of apnea.

There are several levels of sedation, from light to moderate to deep. The evaluation of sedation depth is crucial because it aids in adjusting drug dosage to prevent awareness or excessive anaesthetic depth, which promotes patient safety and quick recovery. The depth of consciousness during MAC can be measured effectively with the bi-spectral index (BIS). A high rate of apnea occurs during MAC, and the rate rises as BIS falls. The use of both BIS and sedative scales to assess a patient's response to sedation is stressed by the low correlation between BIS value and observational sedation scale ratings for various sedative medicines.

The length of the procedure, the patient's age, the requirement for a change to general or regional anaesthesia, and the clinical condition of the patient all influence the choice of the best sedation method. Given the increased likelihood of desaturation and circulatory instability in the elderly population, fewer sedative medications are needed. While selecting the pharmaceuticals, it is important to consider elements such as context-sensitive half-time, effect-site equilibration, and the possibility of drug interactions in addition to the distribution and elimination half-lives. Faster onset and improved prediction of pharmacological effects are provided by focusing on the concentration at the effect-site as opposed to blood concentration. Numerous drug administration methods, including as intermittent boluses, target-controlled infusion, variable-rate infusion, and patient-controlled sedation, can be used to achieve medication treatability.

Anesthesiology and Clinical Science Research Journal publishes high-impact original work in all branches of anaesthesia, Critical Care Medicine, Translational and Clinical Sciences, Clinical Practice, and Technology, Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine, Pain Management.

Authors can submit their manuscripts as an email attachment to: aaacsr@alliedjournals.org

Best Wishes,
Journal Co-ordinator
Anesthesiology and Clinical Science Research.